28.1 C
New York
Saturday, August 9, 2025

Miscarriage of Justice: Judge Declines Ozigbo’s Bid To Reclaim APC Mandate Despite Glaring Evidence

Must read

AWKA, Nigeria — In a ruling that has stunned observers and shaken confidence in Nigeria’s democratic process, the Federal High Court sitting in Awka on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, declined to upturn the outcome of the All Progressives Congress (APC) primary election in Anambra State, affirming Nicholas Ukachukwu’s controversial emergence as the party’s governorship candidate for the upcoming Saturday, November 8 election.

Valentine Ozigbo, a respected business leader and Anambra 2025 Governorship hopeful, had petitioned the court to nullify Ukachukwu’s candidacy, arguing that the latter was not legitimately qualified to contest the party’s primary held on Friday, April 5, 2025.

His legal team led by Umeh Kalu, SAN, and Berth Igwilo, SAN had presented overwhelming and incontrovertible evidence that Ukachukwu’s membership records were fraudulently backdated, in breach of the APC constitution and electoral rules.

However, in a decision delivered today, which the Valentine Ozigbo Political Organisation consider perverse, Justice Evelyn Anyadike held that while there were “discrepancies worthy of concern” in the documentation presented by Ukachukwu, the court lacked the jurisdiction to substitute one candidate for another.

“The court cannot interfere in the internal matters of a political party where the plaintiff has not provided incontrovertible proof of the date of membership, nor shown that the party acted outside its constitutional powers,” Justice Anyadike ruled.

Ironically, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiff on several key procedural and substantive issues.

The judgment has sparked a wave of disbelief and disappointment among Ozigbo’s supporters, many of whom had gathered outside the courtroom in hopeful anticipation of a favourable verdict.

“This is a sad day for the rule of law,” said Ozigbo in a solemn address following the ruling.

“We came to court armed with truth, with documents, with testimonies, only to be told that due process no longer matters.”

He continued, “If a person who failed to meet the party’s constitutional provision can bypass due process through forgery and deceit, what does that say about our democracy?”

Despite the setback, Ozigbo reiterated his commitment to justice but stated he would consult with his lawyers on the next steps.

“We are consulting with our lawyers, we will decide on our next step. I did not fight this case for myself,” he said.

“I fought for Ndi Anambra. I fought to protect the soul of our democracy. And that fight is far from over.”

During the proceedings, Ozigbo’s legal team had tendered sworn depositions from APC officials, indicating that Ukachukwu’s membership registration was altered retroactively to beat the eligibility deadline.

“This was not just about form-filling,” Ozigbo argued. “It was about principle. It was about saying no to criminality. Unfortunately, the court blinked.”

Still, within the APC ranks, reactions were mixed, as many expressed apprehension over what the result means regarding party cohesion, while others warned of long-term consequences.

“This is not a triumph,” said Chief Tony Offiah, a leader of the Valentine Ozigbo Political Organisation. “It’s a warning that corruption can wear a party badge and get away with it.”

“Injustice anywhere threatens justice everywhere,” Ozigbo said, quoting Martin Luther King Jr. “Today may belong to impunity, but tomorrow belongs to the people.”

More articles

- Advertisement -The Fast Track to Earning Income as a Publisher
- Advertisement -The Fast Track to Earning Income as a Publisher
- Advertisement -Top 20 Blogs Lifestyle

Latest article