James Yusuf, Ishaya Ali Poshiya, Nehemiah Yohanna Poshiya, Husseini Poshiya, Hamma Poshiya, Yusuf Mafindi, Yila Boyi, James Bare, Ezekiel Dandaudu, Ali Ishaku, Ilya Bala, Tukur Buratai
The Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant General Tukur Yusuf Buratai | The Trent

Tukur Buratai, the chief of army staff, has asked the Federal High Court, Abuja to dismiss a suit, seeking to compel him to produce the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu.

Kanu’s lawyer, Mr Ifeanyi Ejiofor on Thursday, November 16, 2017 brought an application before the court, praying court to order Buratai to produce Kanu dead or alive.

Ejiofor told court that his client was last seen with the Nigerian Army on September 14 and that neither he (Ejiofor) nor Kanu’s family had seen or heard from Kanu since then.

IPOB Nnamdi Kanu

Opposing the motion, however, Buratai through his counsel, Mr Akinlolu Kehinde, told court that Kanu was not and had never been in the custody of the Nigerian Army.

“The Nigerian Army did not at any time arrest or take Kanu into its custody within the period the military operation lasted in the South-East.”

The lawyer argued that there was no document before the court to prove that Kanu was in the custody of the army, noting that the onus was on Kanu to prove that he was taken by the army.

Kehinde urged the court to dismiss the application on the ground that it was laden with speculations, conjecture and assumptions which, he said were not admissible in law.

A counter-affidavit deposed to by Col. A.A. Yusuf also claimed that the alleged invasion of Kanu’s house during the period of the operation was false.

After hearing arguments from both counsel, Justice Binta Nyako adjourned the matter until Dec. 13 to give her ruling.

1 COMMENT

  1. “The Nigerian Army did not at any time arrest or take Kanu into its custody within the period the military operation lasted in the South-East.” The Trend.

    Simply stated; The military operation was declared against a civic group to kill, maim and arrest every other person belonging to this group with subsequent declaration of victory against the group, only to explicitly ignore or rather protect the leader of the group.

    Even after declaring the group a terrorist organization, the same security agents and military force have no more interest in declaring the said leader of a purported terrorist group that they did not kill or have in their custody wanted.

    You could only be kidding.

    Sorry

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here