Supreme Court Rejects Jimoh Ibrahim Appeal, Ending His Race For Governor

Supreme Court Rejects Jimoh Ibrahim Appeal, Ending His Race For Governor

By Wires | The Trent on November 24, 2016
0
cult innoson Woman, Sons, Homosexual, Act, Police

The Supreme Court on Thursday, November 24, 2016 complicated the troubles of former Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate in Ondo State, Jimoh Ibrahim by referring his case in the court back to the Appeal court.

This comes as an affirmation for Eyitayo Jegede after his Appeal Court win on Thursday as flag bearer in Saturday’s governorship election in Ondo State.

The apex court struck out of all the pending interlocutory appeals filed by the Ali Modu Sheriff faction of the party on Thursday.

Justice Walter Onnoghen, leading four other justices of the apex court, held that Wednesday’s judgment of the Court of Appeal on the main appeals rendered the interlocutory ones academic. Onnoghen held that it was against the rules of the court to determine interlocutory appeals and motions when a lower court had decided on the substantive issues.

“To this end, all interlocutory appeals relating to the Ondo State PDP governorship crisis and the leadership tussle of the party at the national level are hereby struck out.

“The contending parties are ordered to go back to the lower court and do the needful. “ That would mean filing notice of appeal on the judgment of the Court of appeal,” he stated.

Jegede who is the candidate of the Makarfi faction of the party, was relisted to contest against other leading candidates such as Rotimi Akeredolu of All Progressives Congress (APC) and Olusola Oke of the Alliance for Democracy.

Justice Ibrahim Saulaawa, who led two other justices in a unanimous decision, held that the Federal High Court, Abuja, erred in its Oct. 14 ruling which substituted Jegede’s name with that of Ibrahim.

He also held that the court equally erred when it ordered INEC to remove the name of the appellant from its nomination register. Justice George Mbaba, who delivered the lead judgment on the party’s leadership crisis, described the process that led to the June 29 judgment as a “ fraud.’’

Mbaba said the trial court breached Section 36(1) of the constitution by denying the Ahmed Makarfi Caretaker Committee right to fair hearing.

NO COMMENTS

Leave a Comment

To leave a comment anonymously, simple write your thoughts in the comments box below and click the ‘post comment’ button.