21.9 C
New York
Tuesday, October 13, 2026

CNN, MS NOW, and Politico Sue Trump Over White House Ban

Must read

WASHINGTON, United States — CNN, MS NOW, and Politico sued President Donald Trump on Monday, September 21, 2026, after his administration barred their journalists from the White House, prompting five major television networks to suspend their shared coverage of presidential activities.

The three organisations are seeking an emergency federal court order restoring their journalists’ access.

RELATED: White House Bars CNN, MS NOW, and Politico Reporters After Trump Announces Ban

Their lawsuit alleges that the administration violated constitutional protections for freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and due process by withdrawing press credentials in response to their reporting.

The legal action followed Trump’s decision on Friday to exclude the organisations from the White House, accusing them of publishing false and unfavourable reports.


The White House
The White House grounds are seen behind CNN senior White House reporter Betsy Klein after the network was denied entry on September 19, 2026. | Graeme Sloan/Getty Images

Major Networks Refuse to Replace CNN

The dispute disrupted presidential television coverage on Monday after the White House removed CNN from its scheduled assignment to provide footage of Trump’s activities, including his trip to New York for the United Nations General Assembly.

Under the established White House television pool arrangement, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox News take turns providing footage for distribution to other news organisations when access to presidential events is limited.

The remaining networks declined to replace CNN, leaving the pool without a primary television crew for presidential events.

In a joint statement, the five networks said the government should not restrict a news organisation because it objected to its reporting.

Their decision suspended the shared television coverage ordinarily provided by the pool but did not prevent individual networks from continuing their reporting on the administration.

President Donald Trump speaks to members of the press on October 19, 2025 aboard Air Force One. |
President Donald Trump speaks to members of the press on October 19, 2025 aboard Air Force One. | Alex Wong/Getty Images

Journalists Challenge Revocation of Credentials

The restrictions took effect after Trump announced the ban on Truth Social on Friday, citing his objections to the three organisations’ coverage.

On Saturday, Secret Service personnel denied entry to CNN correspondent Betsy Klein, MS NOW correspondent Akayla Gardner, and Politico correspondent Cheyenne Haslett when they attempted to enter the White House complex.

Their press passes were confiscated.

The ban also prevented the organisations from accessing their designated White House workspaces, while CNN and MS NOW were denied use of their television equipment and camera positions on the grounds.

In a joint statement published on X, the organisations accused the administration of withdrawing their credentials without providing an opportunity to challenge the decision.

“Without notice or process, the White House revoked our journalists’ credentials because it objected to our reporting,” they said.

Trump defended his decision on Monday, describing the restrictions as an action against what he called “FAKE NEWS” rather than an attack on press freedom.

He also alleged that the organisations’ reporting posed a national security threat.

Federal Court to Consider Emergency Request

The 27-page lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, names the three news organisations and their affected White House correspondents as plaintiffs.

Trump, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Communications Director Steven Cheung, and Secret Service Director Sean Curran are named as defendants.

The plaintiffs argue that the administration withdrew their credentials because of the content of their reporting, violating the First Amendment.

They also allege that the lack of notice and an opportunity to contest the decision violated their constitutional due process rights.

CNN's Kit Maher, center, and other members of the press look at a statement from White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt about a reported suspicious package on President Donald Trump's route to Palm Beach International Airport, aboard Air Force One
CNN’s Kit Maher, center, and other members of the press look at a statement from White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt about a reported suspicious package on President Donald Trump’s route to Palm Beach International Airport, aboard Air Force One on January 11. | Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images

The organisations are seeking a temporary restraining order to restore access while the case proceeds.

The case has been assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly, a Trump appointee who previously ordered the restoration of former CNN correspondent Jim Acosta’s White House credentials during a dispute with the administration in 2018.

The organisations are represented by First Amendment lawyer Ted Boutrous, who also represented CNN in the Acosta case.

The plaintiffs have cited previous federal court decisions protecting journalists against exclusion from the White House on the basis of their reporting.

The court could consider the emergency application during the week.

CNN, MS NOW, and Politico have said they will continue covering the Trump administration while pursuing their legal challenge.

CNN
The CNN booth at the White House after US President Donald J. Trump announced he would ban CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, from the White House in Washington, DC, on Friday, September 18, 2026. | Evan Vucci/Reuters

More articles

- Advertisement -The Fast Track to Earning Income as a Publisher
- Advertisement -The Fast Track to Earning Income as a Publisher

Latest article