#ThrowBack: Here’s What Buhari’s Spokesman Wrote About Saraki In 2013

#ThrowBack: Here’s What Buhari’s Spokesman Wrote About Saraki In 2013 [MUST READ]

By Opinions | The Trent on September 23, 2015
Appeal Court Saraki
Senator Bukola Saraki speaking during a meeting with the press corp on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 | NAN

by Femi Adesina

Former Kwara State governor and now senator representing Kwara Central, Dr. Bukola Saraki, was guest of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) earlier this week.  According to reports, he was quizzed for many hours, and later allowed to go home.

What questions did Saraki have to answer?  His role in the collapsed Societe Generale Bank of Nigeria, where he was an Executive Director,  and where depositors lost money in billions.  Again, he was said to have been grilled on how he managed the finances of Kwara State as a two-term governor.

Naturally, the fact that Saraki was quizzed by the EFCC should not have raised any dust.  If he did things that demanded explanations while he held those two former positions, then he should be grilled.  No one is above the law, and the fact that he is being questioned does not tantamount to automatic guilt.

But there is this buzz going round about Saraki and his role in the fuel subsidy payments saga.  Last year, he had raised a motion in the Senate, seeking an investigation into the N240 billion budgeted in the 2011 Appropriation Act for fuel subsidy.  Some people say it has put him permanently in the Black Book of certain powerful forces in government.

Saraki, chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Ecology, had pointed out that the sum of N240 billion had been budgeted to subsidize petroleum products in 2011, but that more than N1.2 trillion was actually spent by the end of that year.  The disclosure sparked off spiral effects, leading to the prosecution of a number of oil marketers today.

But in Nigeria, whistleblowers often land in trouble, particularly when the whistling is against the Establishment.  Stories making the rounds say Bukola Saraki is now paying the price for not learning to keep his leaking mouth shut.  That is why first the Special Fraud Unit (SFU) of the Nigeria Police was first unleashed against him, and now the EFCC.

Now, let’s look at the content of the squeal by Saraki, for which he’s paying dearly today.  His motion stated that the sum of N771 billion was spent, which was 700% above the budgeted sum for subsidy in 2011.  He added that if the trend continued, N1.2 trillion would have been spent by just one agency of government in one year, exceeding the total capital budget of N1.1 trillion for that fiscal year.

As if determined to talk himself into trouble, Senator Saraki suggested the setting up of a committee to investigate how the excess funds were sourced.  He added that although N20 billion was set aside for subsidy on monthly basis in the 2011 Appropriation Act, a total sum of N165 billion was expended in August 2011 alone, out of which NNPC got N88 billion, and independent marketers got N77.6 billion.

Again, he observed that although N240 billion was budgeted for the entire year, N391 billion had been spent at August ending.

Saraki had asked for trouble, and he got it.  He had unsettled a colony of wasps, and he was about to be stung till kingdom come.

Based on his motion, civil rights activists and other Nigerians put pressure on the Federal Government, which eventually asked the EFCC to investigate the matter, and prosecute those culpable.  A number of those fingered in the shady deals are on trial today.

And did Saraki live happily ever after?  The buzz claims that it was when his troubles began.  The SFU was first sent after him, and he was declared wanted for his roles in the mismanagement of the Societe Generale Bank of Nigeria (SGBN), which had led to the license of the financial outfit being withdrawn in 2005.

Again, this week, the EFCC struck.  After a disquieting lull in the activities of the commission, it suddenly remembered that Saraki was there, and pulled him in for questioning on Monday.  Is the EFCC on to something concrete, or is this part of the classic way in which government hounds its opponents?

I admit.  Depositors lost billions in SGBN, and I remember that the then Kwara State governor, Mohammed Lawal (now deceased) had said the money was deployed by the Saraki family to unseat him from office, and plant Bukola in power.

But it is now 10 years since the man became governor, and eight years since the bank crumbled.  Is it not long enough to put a closure to the matter? How long did it take to investigate Bernard Madoff over his Ponzi scheme, through which he defrauded people of billions of dollars in the U.S?

Why then is the SGBN matter a kind of albatross hung round Saraki’s neck anytime he talks or acts out of turn?  Nigeria should really learn to do things differently.

While serving as governor, it was said that Saraki waived his immunity, and allowed himself to be questioned on the SGBN matter.  So, why is there nothing conclusive yet?

And if the man fiddled with the money of the state he governed, he has been out of office for more than two full years.  Is it not long enough a time to build a watertight case and haul him before the courts?

If Saraki did not talk out of turn on petroleum subsidy, would he not be in the good books of the government today? Or does he have more information on the subsidy scam that some people are afraid of?  That is the bane of our country.  You are chummy with the powers-that-be only if you don’t rock the boat.  If you do, a price is put on your head.  This country sef!

Femi Adesina, the current Special Adviser to President Muhammadu Buhari on Media and Publicity was the Editor of The Sun Newspapers as at the time of this publication. This article was first published on The Sun on Friday, August 16, 2013.

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author.


  1. And so? that was femis opinion then as a business man propably based on the information at his disposal. He is another role now and propably might have seen better. Also note that the presidency is not anyway part of this.

    • He should maintain his stand no matter on which side of the divide he is or resign. That is what honest principled people do. He should even go further to defend his stance.

    • Absolutely, that he wrote it then about Saraki, does not say anything. Those were his views as a media person and this cannot be anyway attached to the presidency in anyway.

      Moreover, the issues Saraki is facing and declaration of assets.

  2. see your article shows Saraki couldnt handle previous responsibilities, so why should he be enate president, shy should blow whistles when his hands are also stained, my view is the Evil doers are disgracing themselves so let them do so, and jail themselves, every kwara state citizen knows Saraki wa the worst representative for senate President.

  3. see your article shows Saraki couldn’t handle previous responsibilities, so why should he be Senate president, why should he blow whistles when his hands are also stained, my view is the Nigeria’s Evil doers are disgracing themselves so let them do so, and jail themselves too, every kwara state citizen knows Saraki was and, is the worst representative for senate President.

  4. Mr Adesina would have known by now that criminal matters are not time barred and for this reason, any unfinished criminal matter can be revived and pursued by any State apparatus at any time. His suggestion that such matters need not drag for ever and should be concluded as soon as possible is germaine to proper dispensation of justice.
    Furthermore, Femi, in that article was also entrapped, like most emotional Nigerians, in the “enemies at war” syndrome. For this group, every action does NOT attract an equal and opposite reaction. Rather, when fortune smiles at you, you take the credit but when you’re unfortunate, your enemies take the blame.
    Let’s set Saraki’s fans and opponents aside and consider what the man himself thinks and said about his situation, to the effect that he was being hounded because he is Senate President.
    Deep inside Saraki’s mind, he knows that he lied! He knows the sins he had committed and he knows the penalties for the sins. But in line with his privileged upbringing, he believes he can get away with any crime, at least in Nigeria. If Nigerians were to vote for a Senate President, certainly, 15,000 PHCN staff whose property at 15A and 15B Macdonald, Ikoyi which he forcefully acquired in 2009 would not have voted for him because the property was one of the legacies to yield pension money for retired workers of that Company. But Saraki forced the hand of the Presidential Implementation Committee and acquired the property. This is just one out of the 13 count charge he is facing today. The evidence of Saraki’s anticipatory declaration of that asset today still lies at the Registry of a Lagos High Court, sitting at Igbosere where Saraki was dragged over the Macdonald Ikoyi property in 2009. How then could he have claimed to have bought the property long before then and declared same as asset already owned by him?
    Let’s just leave Saraki to carry his cross and pray for our Nation to be rid of graft. Until Saraki prays the humble man’s prayer that says ..”May God make me the kind of man my dog thinks I am” with a repentant heart and asks to be forgiven, he will perpetually live under the bondage of guilt, Senate President or no Senate President. Such men remain fake for ever, no matter what garb they adorne themselves with!

    • I agree with the last Author as he may be a living witness to the shady deal done by Saraki in 2009… ‘Evils that men do live with them’ (not after)…… Let’s wait and see which way the pendulum swings…..

  5. Let me rephrase his last paragraph. “If Saraki did not violate APC position over who should be senate president, would he not be in the good books of the APC government today? Or are some persons afraid of his senate presidency? That is the bane of our country. You are chummy with the powers-that-be only if you don’t rock the boat. If you do, a price is put on your head. This country sef!

    Conclusion, PMB and by extension APC are not different from the old order!

Leave a Comment

To leave a comment anonymously, simple write your thoughts in the comments box below and click the ‘post comment’ button.